Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="JazzNC, post: 2350160, member: 6034"]
Seriously, I don't want to argue with anyone.  I simply don't like Majak, and don't think he's worth a scholarship, especially if it's simply for practice purposes/depth as has been suggested.  If that's the reason, get a grad transfer who won't take up four years.  IMO he is way below our normal standards.  We can simply agree to disagree, and that's ok.

Sadly, however,  the vibe I'm getting is similar to the last time that I didn't like a guy we pursued and ultimately landed.  At that time, it was as though a bunch of staff were on here and anyone who said they didn't like this player was given a difficult time.  Unfortunately, since Waters wrote an article on Majak and there are lots of posts defending this potential offer, I think it's pretty safe to assume that Majur Majak will be coming aboard.

That said, I praise the staff when it is warranted, and have done so with the acquisitions of Carey and Bazely.  But the truth is, the only power 5 school to offer Majak is Washington. In fact, only one ACC school (thus far) has a commitment from a player outside the top 300 rankings.  There is nothing that anyone can say that will convince me that Majak is worth the offer, and I defend my right to post that I think he's nowhere near worthy of a four year scholarship.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?