Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Orangezoo, post: 2351447, member: 237"]
This is a better more logical explanation than what you were posting before and seems to be a shift if only one in clarity.

Primary disagreement-

- Cuse past history of centers shows we have generally recruited poorly at the 5 and this is why Majak would be a bad addition. What would make it bad , and this is where you have circled back around is if Majak is the guy we need to contribute then it is not ideal. We agree on that point and I always held that same view. In respect to past Center recruitment and it being poor overall as a result of  a low ranking or underperformance early I disagree and see zero connection with Majak.

I also disagree with immediately dismissing Majak pending more time to see how things play out. Like the OG article shows we don't know much yet. Too early to be too far down either the yes or no rabbit hole and so far staff is not committing anything other than interest.

In terms of bullying it really is just your view. The art of argument is to persuade. Thus any disagreement is the attempt to debate your point and persuade. It would be easy to claim you are bullying throughout this thread and state even things like telling me how to respond to you. I don't see your opinions as bullying and anyone's response to you has been nothing of the sort either. No olive branch is needed as there was only debate and a quick call out on things getting off track. I promise you no one is bullying you.. they may be trying to get you to see things their way but that is all part of debate and a message board.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?