Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jsshap, post: 1355150, member: 1459"] I have not read the sanctions decision since it came out, and perhaps I misread it, but when I read it I thought it was clear in what it said -- if SU has already received commitments for players for next year it can elect to defer the penalty until the following year. In other words, based on my reading, it just as easily could have said "since Syracuse has already received commitments for next year, Syracuse has the option of deferring scholarship sanctions until the following year." The notion that the meaning of this provision is fluid and changes based on subsequent events does not make sense to me and offends standard principles of legal interpretation. [/QUOTE]