Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jgeorge322, post: 5738978, member: 761"] Yea but i think there’d still be a loss of value to the counterparty if the player is injured - the player loses notoriety and therefore not as beneficial to the counterparty from a marketing perspective. Wouldnt a nil contract be much more valuable if calvin had 1500 receiving yards and 10 tds? Also calvin undoubtedly is getting rev share and now the school isnt getting the benefit of its bargain. That sounds like an insurable risk. I wonder if under the rules, if a player is injured for the year, if you can get some credit for the rev share - otherwise youre still restricted by the cap. One thing i could see for nil insurance for a player is the insurer acts as a backstop if the nil counterparty doesnt pay/goes bankruptcy/etc. [/QUOTE]