Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Antiprodigy, post: 1791514, member: 582"]
You have your view, as stated, on whether this is a renovation or re-build.  Though, the proposal isn't just a new roof, as you stated.  But like everyone else, it really doesn't matter how you feel, as you are not one of the involved parties.

Ultimately, this is a discussion between the University & Carrier.  It could ultimately include a court decision, if the two parties can not come to an amicable solution.  But it is foolish to think of a University as anything other than a corporation.  You personally may feel differently about that, but I doubt the business side of the University does.  This is modern corporate ethics, whether you like it or not.

I suspect that the naming issue definitely played a part in the scope & scale of the re-build.  I am willing to bet that the University wanted to ensure that there would be enough changes to the facility to give them plenty of ammunition in the case that they would not be able to come to terms with Carrier.  The potential income stream from naming rights would be a significant sum for the University.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?