Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
Carrier Dome naming rights article
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="sutomcat, post: 1792269, member: 27"] Syracuse could have made a lot more money that the one time payment of $2.75 million for naming rights Carrier made in 1979. The University of Minnesota got $1.4 million a year from TCF Bank for naming rights to their new stadium. UCF got $1 million per year from Bright House Networks. Florida Atlantic got $500K per year for 12 years from the GEO Group. Even lowly Rutgers got $6.5 million in a 10 year deal for the naming rights to their football stadium back in 2011. Since the facility hosts basketball as well, naming rights are a lot more valuable than a normal football stadium. Yum! paid $13.5 million for a 10 year naming agreement for UL's new basketball arena. DePaul is getting at least $22 million for naming rights to their new basketball arena, the McCormick Place Events Center. To their credit, they honored the agreement. My position is that when vast changes are made to a building along the lines of what has been proposed for the Carrier Dome, it really isn't the same building. If you replace the walls, the roof, the lighting, heating and cooling (added/not replaced), the scoreboards, the sound system, the playing surface for football and basketball, the bathrooms, all the entrances, extend the concourses, replace most or all of the seats, add private boxes, add a food court, attach a hotel, attach an academic building, attach a recreational building with many amenities for fans, etc., the question becomes, what remains of the original building? Hevck, it isn't even going to be the same type of building. This isn't a question of ethics. It is a question of how much a building can be changed and still be considered the same building. If the proposals and accidentally leaked drawings are accurate, no reasonable person could look at the building SU is going to have and the building that was built in 1979 and consider them the same building. At least in my opinion. I hope this issue doesn't get brought into the courthouse. If it does, I am confident SU will be found to be in the right here. Especially if the case is heard in Syracuse, after what UTC has done with Carrier since they bought the company. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
Carrier Dome naming rights article
Top
Bottom