Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="TheCusian, post: 1792272, member: 2585"] No. Because increasing the footprint, changing the capacity, and the roof all add up to significant changes to the facility that it would be prudent and smart to explore the terms of the deal and seek more revenue. Nice use of the word whore to make it seem more nefarious than it actually is. How about since both sides are gaining something of value we call it a "partnership"... You know like how the bazillion of the type relationships are categorized now in the business world. As for the outcry from alumni and bad press? You might be the only one. Big corporations don't get the same treatment as families that have donated money. They aren't people. No matter what Romney thinks ;). [/QUOTE]