Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="HRE Otto IV, post: 5589422, member: 5685"]
I think for the P4 you should rank teams based off of P4 Ws. Then FBS Ws. I think that is fair enough.

It forces you to actually play real teams. FCS games hurt you as it could mean the difference in ranking. If you have 9 P4 Ws and 2 FBS you will be ahead of a team that has 9 P4 Ws, 1 FBS, and 1 FCS.

Also P4 Ls don't really hurt you. A team that plays 12 P4 games and goes 9-3 will be ahead of a team that plays 9 P4 games and goes 11-1.

Not sure how you place the G6s though in the rankings. I suppose you can keep them eye test cases.

Looking at the current Top 15 you would get...

1. Ohio State 
2. Indiana 
3. Oregon (+2)
4. BYU (+7)
5. UGA (-2)
6. Texas Tech (-2)
7. A&M 
8. Notre Dame (+2)
9. Bama 
10. Miami (+2)
11. Utah (+4)
12. Ole Miss (-6)
13. Oklahoma (-5)
14. Vandy 
15. Texas (-2)

After the CCGs you would have a Top 4 of B1G Champ, B1G runner up, B12 Champ, and SEC Champ. Oregon would be the 5 seed. Miami would be the last team in. The big losers here are Ole Miss and Oklahoma. BYU is the big winner.

These SEC teams get away with playing only 8 conference games and no one OOC. That changes next year when they go to 9 conference games. Which would make the above system even more fair.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?