Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="HRE Otto IV, post: 5254299, member: 5685"] Really there isn't much logic to having a Top 25 when only 7 at larges are taken. What they should do is rank the current leaders in each of the 9 conferences (10 next year) in order. Then a Top 10 of everyone else. Ranking teams 16-25 season pointless. Also doing it as I suggest allows for more movement versus boxing the committee in. Conference leaders 1. Oregon 2. Texas 3. SMU 4. Boise State 5. ASU 6. Tulane 7. Louisiana 8. Miami OH 9. Jacksonville State That gives you a better idea of who is getting a Top 4 seed and the 5th auto bid Top 10 at larges 1. Ohio State 2. Penn State 3. Notre Dame 4. Miami 5. UGA 6. Tennessee 7. Indiana 8. Clemson 9. Bama 10. Ole Miss That gives you a better idea of who is close to getting the 7th at large bid. None of the other ranked teams have a shot at the auto bid. [/QUOTE]