Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
CFP Rankings for Nov 4
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Archbold44, post: 5555132, member: 10528"] The ACC is looking squarely at 1 AQ. But the ACC ridiculously does not want to have 2 AQs out of 16 teams in a 4-4-2-2-1-3. If there was a 4-4-2-2-1-3... the current field would be: 4 B1G: Ohio State, Indiana, Oregon, USC 4 SEC: A&M, Alabama, Georgia, Ole Miss 2 ACC: Louisville, Virginia 2 B12: Texas Tech, BYU 1 G5: Memphis 3 At-Large: ND (Independent) and Texas/Oklahoma (both SEC). And there are ways in which the B12 and ACC could end up stealing the spot held by Texas/Oklahoma in that scenario anyway. Utah wins out. If Pitt wins out--beating ND, Ga Tech, and Miami... THAT 10-2 Pitt would easily be in the mix for top 15 to get an at-large without interfering with Louisville/Virginia. If Ga Tech wins out and is 11-1, with a win over Georgia... they could possibly be an at-large candidate. So that is three ACC/B12 teams that could end up with an at-large on top of their 2 AQs. The 2 AQs is not a cap. It is a minimum. The ACC was absurd to reject that. Instead, the ACC/B12 dug in and agreed to keep the 1 AQ/12 teams. There are 3 clear B1G: Ohio State, Indiana, Oregon. It is hard to see A&M, Georgia, Alabama, and Ole Miss falling out. That is 7/12. G5 = 8. B12 AQ =9. ACC AQ= 10. So now you have two more spots... currently B12 #2 and ND. And you have 2 SEC and a B12 ahead of the second ACC entrant. Suppose BYU beats Texas Tech and it is BYU (12-0) vs Texas Tech (10-2) in the B12 CCG. That is equivalent to last year's ACC CG where Texas Tech wins and BYU still gets in. If Louisville 11-1 faces Virginia 11-1 in the CCG... the loser could very well be out at 11-2. Ga Tech could beat Georgia, but not even make the ACC CCG at 11-1. With 12 team playoff... two 11-win ACC teams on the outside. If Pitt goes 10-2 to beat ND, Ga Tech, and MIami... they might open up a spot... but does it go to Pitt or the loser of the ACC CG? Or does it go to Utah who wins out... or Texas/Oklahoma? Why would the ACC not want a second guaranteed playoff team EVERY year? This year there are 5 in the top 21, but none in the top 14, because of parody. It is going to be like that for the B12/ACC almost all years. For every year they get 3 out of 12, there will be 5 more that each gets 1. Last year was B12, this year will be ACC. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
CFP Rankings for Nov 4
Top
Bottom