Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Dick_in_MI, post: 5466828, member: 225"] On the contrary, I don't see how it looks [I]bad[/I] for the school. They apparently viewed him as something of loose cannon and stood their ground. They told him that he was free to donate through a collective like most other donors, and he has chosen not to. Toss in the fact that other donors likely have made up the difference, and I doubt SU views it as a problem. Then there is the$30K payment to a player that SU didn't know about. Not sure which side that particular "accounting error" is on. At the end of the day, AW doesn't want to donate through a collective, SU is fine with the current status of the relationship, and I can go back to not caring until the next volley from the PR machine. [/QUOTE]