Changes are unknown at this time per ESPN. I would imagine either more players or draft picks are involved. I believe Stern wanted to insure NO got a fair shake in all of this, but I'm in agreement with you, he should have stayed out of this in the first place.Is it the same trade? How could he approve it this time?
Btw, don't get me wrong, I am not a fan of what he did in the first place.
Is it the same trade? How could he approve it this time?
Btw, don't get me wrong, I am not a fan of what he did in the first place.
Changes are unknown at this time per ESPN. I would imagine either more players or draft picks are involved. I believe Stern wanted to insure NO got a fair shake in all of this, but I'm in agreement with you, he should have stayed out of this in the first place.
Stern did this because the other owners complained.
Considering the bind they're in, I think they did pretty well, even in the old trade.