Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="WoadBlue, post: 5425102, member: 1145"]
You assume that the ACC left behind will have more power than the Pac left behind and be allowed a team in the playoffs. Why do you assume that? Every sign from especially SEC but also BT is that each would be very happy with a 2 conference upper tier for football, meaning nobody else gets any shot at playing  against them when money matters. And if between them they can get what all they want from the ACC , there will be nothing left for them to care about in any ACC any more than in today's Pac.

Are you assuming that SEC and BT will no longer add teams? If so, why? Can you not see that if they totally run and exclusively benefit from an upper tier of just them that they get more than if the upper tier is closed event 4 leagues? Do you think their greed is now satiated? If so, why would it be until they have everything? 
 
My assessment: Either the ACC gets stronger in the ways that make football wealth and power, or the ACC future is either to become the next SWC (today dead) or the next new Pac (survive in name as a less than Major conference).

Every ACC member that could get into SEC or BT would do so to avoid even the fate of being the next new Pac.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?