Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Cuse181, post: 5016180, member: 8295"] That is true, Florida won the case that was claiming political retaliation, the more impactful one for Disney directly deals with the special district poison pill that rendered RDs board changes largely moot. That is a state case and one that I feel Disney has much more interest in. While i agree that their sway may have [I]slightly [/I]shrunk, they are still the second largest streamer in the US, still hold the most popular sports service in the US and they have a heavily vested interest in maintaining the appeal of their sports network as it drives a significant share of their revenue via linear and DTC agreements. [/QUOTE]