Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SUskibum, post: 5723537, member: 149"] Ok, guys its been a couple years since I have been plugged into hoops (Red ruined it for me), and this year has been dizzyingly busy. I needed a summary of Shertz style and this is what Gemini gave me... Tony Bennet on defense, low risk/gamble, discipline through the shot clock and relentless rebounding (basically pack line) This was the offensive summary: That is a fantastic basketball question. To give you the short answer: Luke Murray (UConn) and Nate Oats (Alabama) actually run very different systems, and Josh Schertz is a beautiful, lethal hybrid of the two. If you had to pick one, Schertz's style of play and mechanics are closer to UConn, but his shot selection and spacing are pure Alabama. Here is a breakdown of how the three mastermind offenses compare: 1. The Alabama Way (Nate Oats) Nate Oats runs what is essentially the "analytics movement" in college basketball. It is heavily inspired by the NBA's Houston Rockets under Daryl Morey. The Philosophy: It is all about "Rim or 3." Mid-range jumpers are mathematically forbidden. The Mechanics: Alabama relies heavily on transition speed, spreading the floor as wide as possible, and using the Spread Pick-and-Roll. They want to beat you off the dribble, force the defense to collapse, and kick it out for a wide-open three. It relies on elite individual guards winning one-on-one matchups. 2. The UConn Way (Luke Murray / Dan Hurley) Luke Murray is the offensive architect behind Dan Hurley, and their system is the exact opposite of Alabama's free-flowing, isolation-heavy style. The Philosophy: UConn runs a highly orchestrated, European-style offense. It is heavily reliant on a massive playbook of set plays. The Mechanics: Instead of one-on-one basketball, UConn uses intricate, labyrinth-like off-ball screens (like stagger screens and flare screens). They use their big men as massive screeners and passing hubs to get shooters open. It requires extreme precision and memorization. Where Josh Schertz Fits In Schertz takes the best elements of both worlds and blends them into a 5-out motion offense that looks a lot like the NBA's Denver Nuggets (with Nikola Jokic) or the Golden State Warriors. Like UConn (The Mechanics): Schertz doesn't rely on isolation or pick-and-roll like Alabama. His offense is built on constant, dizzying off-ball movement, dribble hand-offs (DHOs), and backdoor cuts. Just like UConn, he runs his offense through a high-IQ, passing big man at the top of the key to pick apart the defense. Like Alabama (The Spacing and Analytics): While UConn will gladly take a mid-range jumper if the set play calls for it, Schertz is just as mathematically ruthless as Nate Oats. Schertz plays five guys on the perimeter, spaces the floor to the absolute maximum, and hunts down 3-pointers and layups at an incredibly high volume. The "Schertz" Difference: Unlike UConn, which calls a strict set play almost every time down the court, Schertz's system is based on "flow." He teaches his players how to read the defense and react on the fly, making it almost impossible to scout because the players are making decisions in real-time rather than running a predetermined route. If that Syracuse rumor actually comes true tomorrow, the Dome is going to see an offense that is as complex and unselfish as UConn's, but as fast and 3-point heavy as Alabama's. [/QUOTE]

Verification: What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?