Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="jncuse, post: 5723704, member: 1969"]
[B]I'm sure the same post has been made dozens of times in this thread, which i have only read limited pages of, but here is my opinion.[/B]

D2 Final 4/Runner Up (4 times in 6 years)
to Indiana St (Conference Champs in 10th best conference)
to Saint Louis (Regular Season Champs in 7th best conference)
to Syracuse

Siena (Post Season Champs in 25th best conference)
to Syracuse

There just seems to be at least one and maybe two steps missing in GMac's progression.
Someone who has raised a program multiple times, and progressively tougher levels seems to make much more sense in a dire situation for our pro.
[I][U][/U][/I]
[U][I]And this doesn't necessarily need to be for Schertz but for another hire outside of the program as well, although those names seem limited right now.[/I][/U]

Now I understand if "Coach Comp", and "NIL" had limited us, then we are limited in terms of attractive hires and GMac makes sense if you can't get more experience.

But if Comp and NIL is not a significant restrictor, we should be looking for someone who has made more career progression than GMac.

Short term benefits like an extra million or two in NIL, or initial ticket sales should be totally irrelevant in the decision.   It's who more likely can make us competitive in the next few year (#25-#40 type team that is not on the bubble).

I will say one advantage for GMac, is if we had that moderate success for a few seasons under him, this appears to be a destination for him.    And that's can't be a certain for another hire.   But I think it has to go first to the guy we think has more chance of turning this around ... and you have to consider results for that.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?