Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="All4SU, post: 2992766, member: 381"] Sometimes I wonder if I just don’t understand what people are thinking at all. When Archbold Stadium was built, it was recognized as one of the greatest stadiums of its era. When the Carrier Dome was constructed, it was viewed as a unique college football venue both practically and technologically. I certainly wouldn’t say SU has a history of poor decisions or “cheap” solutions historically when it comes to building stadiums. Even Manley was bigger than most small private schools possessed in it’s time. Yes you can make a case that SU doesn’t have a unlimited check book, and that forces them to be more practical. But it’s not like they build s#!+ either. The Dome has been remarkable in terms of longevity, versatility and practicality. Let’s wait and see how the rebuild turns out. Addendum: As far as parking is concerned, it’s the trade-off we get for having our stadium on campus - as it should be. I wouldn’t give that up. [/QUOTE]