CuseLegacy
Moderator
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 95,937
- Like
- 151,551
"When you get into the spread offense, you are immediately eliminating fullbacks and the tight end position from your offense. If you can become a good pro-style of attack with good personnel, the possibilities are endless. The flexibility in attacking teams becomes wide open."
Interesting...
I can't believe he refrained from saying you can be multiple...Interesting...
Interesting...
Weird. Who cares about FB's and TE's if you have a system that can roll up yards and points with HB's and WR's? Do you get more points if a FB scores?
Its just mindblowing, it really is. Its moronic, It's like saying I have a great business making a ton of money, but I need to try different things because well I just need too. The opportunity may not even bet there.
I'm no spread zealot, I beleive you can be successful in just about any system with decent talent and good coaching. But its not like the spread hasn't been successful. Dozens of teams have won with it. To dismiss it out of hand is just, well, strange.
Skaneateles is looking for a coach. I think they have a lot of talent too.Its just mindblowing, it really is. Its moronic, It's like saying I have a great business making a ton of money, but I need to try different things because well I just need too. The opportunity may not even be there.
I am going to start coaching football, I cant take it. I am on it
Skaneateles is looking for a coach. I think they have a lot of talent too.
ooohhh...can I be your recruiting coordinator?I will bring Millhouse as my OC..
yes, the possibilities are endless - just look at Deleone's playbookInteresting...
yes, the possibilities are endless - just look at Deleone's playbook
when did SU have the most success in modern times? when they were running the freeze-option offense. They were the innovators and running a college offense that other schools weren't doing.
I'm sure a lot of other coaches at the time dismissed it as a gimmick offense - meanwhile just about everyone had trouble stopping it and it took SU to the top 10 and big-time bowl games.
Frustrating. :bat:
What do you think of the high school coach that doesn't punt nor kick away? His take is that by using every opportunity to keep the ball, you increase your potential for scoring more than you increase the percentage that the opposing team will score. He seems to have success with it, but the novelty factor has to make them more successful than if it was more common.Yep some assiatnt coach right now at the D3 level is innovating a new system that will take off.. Innovation is the key to any process... Innovated and others will eventually follow once they realize that it actually works
Innovate is taking a process and finding a way to do it better, not diversifying to the point where you are good at nothing. If a new process is created you implement over and over until you become extremely efficient. Innovation and diversifying are two completely differnt processes
when did SU have the most success in modern times? when they were running the freeze-option offense. They were the innovators and running a college offense that other schools weren't doing.
Interesting...
they didn't run it every play - but they also weren't a "good pro-style of attack" - they were employing highly mobile QBs who could also throw to put pressure on the other teams in ways that the majority of college teams weren't capable of doing. It was more a college specific style of offense than a pro-style.But wasn't the Freeze Option just one component of being "Multiple?" They didn't run the FO every play. It was simply their signature.
All they are trying to do is move a football downfield with the guys they have in place. Yeah, I think some of it is overthought and the coaches go out of their way to limit Nassib.
they didn't run it every play - but they also weren't a "good pro-style of attack" - they were employing highly mobile QBs who could also throw to put pressure on the other teams in ways that the majority of college teams weren't capable of doing. It was more a college specific style of offense than a pro-style.
It isn't that they are "go out of their way to limit Nassib." It is coaches with NFL back grounds thinking that their philosophy is best. What works bets to maximize talent in the NFL is not the same as in CFB. Two totally different games. The sooner our O coaches realize this, the sooner our O will be fixed.
Here's the quote from the post that I replied to, including the bolded portion.Agree with what you have said. But in the context of this thread, what they were was "multiple" and the freeze option was just one of the components. They did some things better than others -- didn't necessarily do everything great (as some here suggest).
Now an argument can be made that the employed the Freeze Option SO well that it overcame their deficiencies in other parts of their offense. But the fact remains, that the multiplicity was a big part of their strategy.