Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 4431816, member: 1969"] I found this in my files from last year that I calculated during the tournament. At the time, People were stating that the ACC got jobbed for seeds based on what Duke, UNC, Miami did. I pulled these together - the committee can only base things on quality wins and other metrics which are highly influenced by OOC play. If your conference sucks before Jan 1, you will have less Q1 and Q2 teams (due to multiplier effect), and less quality wins. I believe good wins were wins vs tourney teams (12 seed or above) and teams that were in the last 8 out. Bad losses were Q3 and Q4 losses against OOC teams. The ACC was comfortably in last in both regards. [ATTACH type="full" alt="1667883825545.png"]221955[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]