Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 867812, member: 1969"] That's not really accurate. Its pretty accurate right now in telling us what range teams are in, and where teams are headed vis a vis the tourney. There will be some deviations of course. If you want the system to be accurate in telling you who will be #1, #2, #3, rather than who will be amongst the elite teams, your asking it to do things it was not intended to. As I said below, to accurately rate 350 teams you need to use an efficiency based system. Its going to create a few inconsistencies in terms of what we view as #1-#5, as the system cannot differentiate between a close W or close L. [/QUOTE]