Coaches make peanuts for salaries and they ride buses to games. Recruiting budgets are basically nil and they don’t pay millions for administrative staff.What puzzles me in all of this talk about cutting sports is "How does D-3 pay for any sports right now?" All their sports are non-revenue. Yes, the financial aid for the athletes comes out of the Financial Aid office and doesn't rely 100% on donations, but where do the D-3 schools get the money to operate their teams? Many D-3 schools that play football don't charge admission and Haverford and Swarthmore (to name 2 off the top of my head) don't even have football teams. There's no TV money to speak of. Where does the money come from? Is this the near-term future of D-1?
And most games are somewhat local. Check what they give for meal money.Coaches make peanuts for salaries and they ride buses to games. Recruiting budgets are basically nil and they don’t pay millions for administrative staff.
Maybe, just maybe, coaches shouldn’t be making multi million dollarsCoaches make peanuts for salaries and they ride buses to games. Recruiting budgets are basically nil and they don’t pay millions for administrative staff.
If soccer drove the same revenue...if FB coaches made the same amounts as Soccer coaches you could save millions.
Many possibilities with intercollegiate athletics:
1) Realignment of conferences to lessen travel.
2) Arms race is going to slow down.
3) Non-league games are going to be cut in some way, shape or form.
4) Travel rosters will be implemented/cut for all sports.
5) NCAA could discontinue sponsoring championships for Olympic sports. (Huge chunk of money lost in this area).
you might have to look at some of the non revenue streams too though.. I know that some schools the olympic sports drive by far the biggest revenue in donations.Many possibilities with intercollegiate athletics:
1) Realignment of conferences to lessen travel.
2) Arms race is going to slow down.
3) Non-league games are going to be cut in some way, shape or form.
4) Travel rosters will be implemented/cut for all sports.
5) NCAA could discontinue sponsoring championships for Olympic sports. (Huge chunk of money lost in this area).
you might have to look at some of the non revenue streams too though.. I know that some schools the olympic sports drive by far the biggest revenue in donations.
D3 is basically something to enhance the student experience at the schools. Gives students opportunity to play beyond high school and events for students, staff, alumni and community to attend and support school. D3 games are big deal in a lot of towns, Plattsburgh St. hockey for example.What puzzles me in all of this talk about cutting sports is "How does D-3 pay for any sports right now?" All their sports are non-revenue. Yes, the financial aid for the athletes comes out of the Financial Aid office and doesn't rely 100% on donations, but where do the D-3 schools get the money to operate their teams? Many D-3 schools that play football don't charge admission and Haverford and Swarthmore (to name 2 off the top of my head) don't even have football teams. There's no TV money to speak of. Where does the money come from? Is this the near-term future of D-1?