Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="CaptainJ, post: 1020843, member: 1553"]
If I had to place a wager this very moment, I'd go with no.  If a female loses that kind of weight that fast(or at all) society often calls her unhealthy to appease those who don't.  Heck we do it with males to a lesser extent too.  On occasion, it's even warranted.  Like rooster fights on Oahu, let's get our bets in before this one is called.

As for juicing instead of steroids(although some people call that juicing), maybe it was a combo of the 2, with the latter being of the shredding variety.  For what it's worth, if roids/HGH had anything to do with Lyle Alzado's tumor, (how long ago was that?) their safety and efficacy outperform much of the crap big-pharma has on the market.  Id wager besides revenue loss, the government would feel less in control of the population if more folks were jacked(they might have the confidence to answer Thomas Jefferson's call for each generation having a revolution.  Heaven knows the testosterone has been lacking since the original, and we've witnessed the slow sickness set in, like the frog in the slowly heated water ever since day one as the founding fathers warned) .   At the very least, adult pro athletes should be able to be allowed what to do with their bodies.  Seems a lot more cut and dry and the abortion debate(regardless of where one stands, if they do), at least in that no separate DNA or possibility of a new consciousness is developing from people in peak physical condition.   I probably wont be online for a few days to argue about this but I guess it isn't stopping me from hopefully inspiring people to correct me if I am wrong.

FWIW, I think some of those roosters I saw got injections.   Just having some fun in my last post for a few days.  While I'm at it, let's blame UConn's magic on juicing of either kind, right?
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?