Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Cusefan95, post: 94582, member: 173"] I think JB was just trying to get the media off the topic when he said he wasn't involved in the previous investigation. That troubles me not one bit. If he said he was involved in the previous investigation, what would have happened? He would have been grilled on it for hours by the media. If you say you have no info, there's no where for the media to go with and so they move on to the next topic. Also, CTO had commented days ago that it was SOP for coaches with small kids to fly babysitter with them, so it wouldn't have been unusual or noteworthy since he was there as a babysitter. I do think that most people won't both to sort through details, so that's why SU needs to stand by JB publicly, today (assuming his statement is what we expect). Otherwise the witch hunters will have their scalp by the end of the week. [/QUOTE]