Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="RF2044, post: 5023558, member: 40"] Bill, I appreciate what you were trying to do -- but extrapolating a 40 time isn't the same as reporting one that is officially timed. Despite the missing 40 time, we had other track "comps" that suggested that the kid was blazing fast. There is no way using logic or empirical evidence that he was a 4.71. It wouldn't make sense for that position, and there would be no reason for Fran Brown to recruit a CB with that type of speed [or lack thereof]. For the record, I also don't believe / take at face value the 4.29 estimate -- because it wasn't officially timed, either -- it's just another projection. And also because very few people are capable of running that fast. But no doubt, this kid is fast! [/QUOTE]