Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Definition of Insanity (we still have a facilities problem)
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="The General, post: 495847, member: 1150"] The difference is Carrier is billion dollar corporation. Melo is a private donor and ex-player. You made my point. It would NEVER be done today. So rectify it. What you called then a "corporate donation" would essentially be defined today as "purchasing naming rights." Thus the 33 year old contract in place has become antiquated. They made that gift for the purpose of acquiring naming rights. Not due to their generosity or connection to the University a la Melo. Comparing changing the name of a building named after a Syracuse legend to a building named after a corporation is nonsensical. The above perception is equally as antiquated. I prefer a progressive approach. They have no incentive? Give them one. Offer a buyout or another financial incentive. Or litigate. The contact isn't written in blood is it? The conditions under which the contract was written have dramatically changed. I don't have intimate knowledge of the contract or contract law but I have to imagine it could be contested at this point. It is unlike other buildings on Campus. It's a corporate sponsor under the guise of a gift. Carrier contributes nothing to athletics now, there is no partnership where we mutually promote one another. A true corporate partner can go a long way in expanding the brand. It's 2013. This is how the business of sports is conducted. Someone above said it's a matter of law and ethics. So pursue legal options. And ethics? Drive down Thompson Road and take a look at the massive vacant lot that was once home to thousands of jobs and let's discuss ethics. Carrier abandoned Syracuse because it benefited their corporation. It's time to for us to do the same. Their original "donation" was paramount to the construction of the Dome. That was 33 years ago at a massive discount by today's sponsorship standards. I believe we are even. We should have big orange balls when it come to potentially pulling in millions for athletics. Not mincy little tangerines. I'll see you in the Loud Haus. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Definition of Insanity (we still have a facilities problem)
Top
Bottom