Yeah, he was as active as I've seen him on the glass.He was clearly the best rebounder on the team tonight.
Yeah, he was as active as I've seen him on the glass.
The point total is misleading, though. He scored 8 of our first 10 points and then...kinda vanished on offense. But he did enough other things to make up for it.
He was clearly the best rebounder on the team tonight.
He was clearly the best rebounder on the team tonight.
Silent G has looked good the past few games. The issue I have with him as that offensively he seems to dissappear for long stretches and then when he gets good or even wide open looks (ones he buried in the first half of games) he missed terribly. He had a couple jumpers in the second half last game that were no where close. Would like for him to stay agressive and also to keep shooting it from deep, hes been very good from 3 the past couple weeks.
They're one of the better rebounding teams in the country, and an elite offensive rebounding team - it's how they came within a whisker of beating @ Notre DameAnyone see other GT games? Are they really a good rebounding team because that was concerning.
G was definitely a man on the boards and has been really impressive overall lately.
Really? I wouldn't go that far...Rak gets my nod...
The real issues are that CMAC or TR should ALWAYS be our best rebounders AND that we got absolutely obliterated by GTECH on our defensive glass (19 offensive rebounds or more by GTECH is unsat!)
Yeah but howmany went to techs big wide man. Nobody put a body on him to box him out on the offensive boards. He had atleast 6 of there offensive boards in just 3 sequences.
14 and 10 on 6-11 shooting and 2-2 from three. 1 turnover.