annarbororange
Walk On
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 53
- Like
- 140
NM
What? it's his team? By the way, really, the first one of his coaching career.NM
He better get his oline fixed. It's putrid
I remember many complaining about nassib’s offense early his senior year. They stunk at Minnesota. Then Justin Pugh returned from injury and all of a sudden the O was functional again.
Not saying heckle is Pugh but when you have zero depth you just can’t afford any injuries.
I remember many complaining about nassib’s offense early his senior year. They stunk at Minnesota. Then Justin Pugh returned from injury and all of a sudden the O was functional again.
Not saying heckle is Pugh but when you have zero depth you just can’t afford any injuries.
To what end?"we wanna do things the right way ." brought the team back out from the locker room post game.
No -- Heckel is not Pugh. But you are right that his return could be a big boon to this OL. Because our best OL should be playing LT, but is instead playing C to account for Heckel's absence.
So Heckel's return might actually bolster not one but two spots on this weak OL.
Why is our best LT our back up C. I know he played there before and such but we had an entire offseason to get someone else ready or to recruit a natural center. Just seems taking our LT out and putting him a center is a bad idea.
my interpretation of his comments post game was that he did not like the manner in which they left the field.To what end?
Moe Neal, Luke Benson, Hackett and TJ have all looked good, even dangerous, when catching the ball.Hmm...I remember a couple bad games(Rutgers was horrible), but we lit it up against Northwestern and showed promise against USC.
This offense does absolutely nothing well so far. Zero bright spots in 3 games.
my interpretation of his comments post game was that he did not like the manner in which they left the field.
i read this to be a matter of sportsmanship. i didn't see it. it was unusual. just my thoughts after listening.