Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Pyle, post: 1674253, member: 137"]
I said this and stated it's one of the reasons there should be no 3 strike type of policy. It's not the 3 big ones that are going to do the most damage, at least so it seems in early research. I feel like what we have going on is a bunch of keen jerk reactions to a very serious issue. The problem is that creating policies that really don't protect the athlete from overall damage in the long run don't do much good. You could have a player never suffer a major concussion and still get CTE from the daily pounding. It reminds me a little of the cholesterol issue, for decades people had high cholesterol but not enough research was available to doctors told us all to limit the amount we eat. Turns out that did absolutely nothing except make people's diets miserable since your body is responsible for making the bulk of cholesterol found in your blood. People feeling like 'something needs to be done' before proving whether it has a positive effect or not aren't really helping the situation.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?