Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="billsin01, post: 3221979, member: 837"] For the 9 millionth time -- everyone here will be thrilled if we are loading up on 4- and 5-star players. Of course we never have, aren't currently and very likely never will be in that position. So the question is how relevant are star rankings in that scenario? And while we can all agree those top 250 kids are really good players more often than not, there is a ton of talent outside the top 250. The 2017 pro bowl roster had 35 4/5 star players and 45 3-star and below. What does this mean? Nothing in terms of of the 4- and 5-star kids -- we'll take them where we can get them. But we simply need to find more talent among that group of 3-star and below kids. It's where the bulk of our class will be every year for the forseable future -- whether dino is here or not. So the relevance of the stars is the question every bit as much as the general question of how valid they are. [/QUOTE]