Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="007, post: 4563577, member: 393"]
Ironically, IMO AW's exceptional transparency, intentional visibility, interviews, and social media postings confirming his involvement - although fundamentally different from 99% and a clear indication of his belief (and, more importantly, the belief of his lawyers) that he is doing everything above board and within guidelines - seems to provide a flashing neon sign for the NCAA to consider him an EASY target under the new "circumstantial evidence" clause. And once accused, the NCAA in its infinite "wisdom" is declaring that the "burden of proof" is on the university to: "clearly demonstrate that all behaviors complied with NCAA legislation and interim NIL policy."

To be clear, I am not a lawyer, and, at best, I have a superficial understanding of NIL policy. Nor am I suggesting that AW is doing anything impermissible. My only point/fear is that his well intentioned transparency makes him, and by extension SU, a seemingly easy target for the NCCA [B]regardless[/B] of his "guilt" or innocence. Creating the illusion of authority and enforcement is in the NCAA wheelhouse. It will be interesting to see how this all plays out.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?