Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Cusefan69, post: 4900393, member: 5764"] Thanks Money. So CL has been pretty reliable with inputs and I responded to that input. Her guesses I deem are educated guesses. You have since provided an updated data point. I don't think I am "falling for any narrative ". She offered a data point and I simply said "that makes sense ". You have since added your data point saying otherwise regarding Nil. Ok. Thanks, for the data point. So it's not Nil. Pretty simple man. I just try to be receptive to data points shared and go from there. I DIDN'T start saying it was Nil, that's it. CL provided one and you have provided another and Jake added another. So all good. I will now make my own determination, based on those data points. Again pretty simple. Thanks man and happy holidays. [/QUOTE]