Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
do you guys think that marrone really wants an option based offense
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="SoBristol, post: 61350, member: 485"] You can speculate about what Marrone might want in 2013 and beyond, but the clues so far would be what he brought in as JUCOs/Hofstra transfers, and the WR/TE recruits. His QB recruits have been all over the lot -- doesn't look like Loeb, Miller or Kinder was recruited to run an option attack. His RB recruits have varied from the very heavy (Moore) to the very light (Rene) to the mid-sized (Smith) to the unlikely (Timbers, Smallwood), with only Gulley having early impact. The JUCOs/Hofstra transfers have had a common theme -- big guys to add some toughness to the inside running attack (building around Carter) and short passing (Weaver, Cruz). Not a speed guy or a dual threat QB in the bunch. His WR recruits also have a common theme -- tall and decent size, with Kobena being the exception. Kids who can block; kids who can go over the middle; kids who can contribute on special teams. TE recruits have been blockers, more than receivers. Some of this could reflect the practical reality -- who can he land? Broyld, for example, was a star in Rochester, and played in the Dome in the state finals. He might end up at QB, but he could also play one of several other roles. By and large, I believe in year 3, we are seeing Marrone's base schemes. He wants to make the defense respect inside running, use the TE, and a passing attack that moves the chains. Sure, he would add other dimensions to his base schemes if he had a different QB or better deep receivers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
do you guys think that marrone really wants an option based offense
Top
Bottom