Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="RF2044, post: 4560743, member: 40"] This isn't the point you're making, but I'm just posting this reaction here. If this was 2012 / 2013, and things were humming along and the program was performing well, it might make sense to hire an unproven commodity like Red or GMac on blind faith. Because if they falter, you replace them in 2 - 3 years before the damage gets too severe, and before they can crater things to an unacceptable level. But you give them some time to see if they can sustain the level of success. Today, the damage has already been done. And I don't think the program is in a position where we can afford to take a risk on blind faith with a completely inexperienced hire. [/QUOTE]