Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Cusefan95, post: 4793651, member: 173"] Yep. In the 90s, we spent close to nothing on facilities while an arms race was underway. As everyone else got better training facilities, we became less attractive. While we’ve spent some money since then, we’re still behind most programs. If the question is “why can’t we get top 25 classes like we did in 1994?”, the answer is other schools that were less attractive in 1994 are more attractive to recruits now. We can cycle through coaches until the end of time - but a private school in the northeast is not going to become a power player in college football. [/QUOTE]