Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="orangehomer, post: 1374440, member: 151"] it makes no sense, and the reason why is that good talented players are good talented players, and it really doesn't matter what they did in college. the fallacy is that analysts act like college coaching somehow develops nba talent, which is just not the case. even a phenom like Anthony davis is not good because of anything calipari taught him at Kentucky, he is good because he is a transcendent talent. delusional fan bases like UConn try to tell themselves that their greatness is that they developed nba players. the reverse is the truth. they were great because they had future nba talents, college coaches don't "develop" nba players. they coach to win as many college games as possible. [/QUOTE]