Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="chakka3421, post: 927266, member: 1091"]
Ok fair enough.  I'll share what I can.

Allocation of funds to support the football program versus supporting all sports.  Backed up by percentage allocations other ACC programs allocate to football versus Olympic sports (non SEC as that is extremely football weighted).  The AD's incentive is based on the ranking of all sports combined so naturally less is invested in the football program than other ACC programs. What we don't know yet is if that same incentive for the AD will remain the same with the new Chancellor.

I would rather reallocate the ADs incentive to be based upon some sort of revenue generation model.  For example, if 80% of the revenue is generated direct from the ACC is football related, then 80% of the new revenue streams should be allocated to the football program.  I know in my company the sales people are rewarded the best of all of us.

Obviously you have to support Olympic sports.  That's where your other and current revenue streams can and have been and can continue to be allocated to cover for those expenses including compensation.  I'm just talking about the new revenue stream from the ACC.

I'm just throwing out numbers and percentages as an example as I am not privy anymore to any detail.  Their is a fight going on behind the scenes for allocation of the new revenue streams generated by the ACC.  Nuff said on this subject.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?