Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Willy75, post: 5642272, member: 277"] I think you're correct on the TRO; no need for that (often ex parte) relief where the injunction hearing can get resolved even before spring practice. I'm not too troubled by the inclusion of damages provisions together with what sounds like some fairly standard clauses about the availability of injunctive relief. You can draft (I think) alternatively to cover both; on Duke's side I'd want to insulate against an antitrust counterclaim among other things. Also in terms of one sidedness remember Mensah had a chance to shop himself around before he signed. I do wonder if the whole thing becomes moot if he decides to declare for the draft (is that still possible?). [/QUOTE]