Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Duke QB to Miami?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="FloridaCuse, post: 5645396, member: 8912"] [MEDIA=twitter]2014415131422179422[/MEDIA] Full Tweet: Odds are [URL='https://x.com/McCannSportsLaw']@McCannSportsLaw[/URL] has this right. A settlement looms. Why? Some (long) thoughts: 1. Lurking just beneath resolution of the contract issues are issues neither Duke nor NCAA want resolved by a state court. (Is NIL inducement to play in substance of not form? Indicative of employment?) 2. Contract remedies are awkward here for Duke. They can devalue Mensah’s transfer option significantly — and maybe further induce him to stay — but they cannot keep him playing at Duke via contract enforcement alone. 3. It sure seems Miami is willing to pay enough to offset the costs to Duke of losing Mensah. Gains from trade usually means settlement. I think the background legal risk to Duke and the NCAA also tips the scales toward settlement. 4. The NCAA (wrongly in my view) thinks Congress will save it from the antitrust bludgeoning it has been taking. And so it kicks the can. Gets further bludgeoned. Kicks it again. And so on. The colleges don’t want Duke v Mensah to resolve these issues while they wait for their Great Congressional Hope. 5. There’s a lesson for student-athletes in the college athletics business as well. The payoff of the antitrust wins is to be treated like a professional. I understand we are in an awkward in between phase now where everyone is figuring out what that means — institutions and players alike. But the right that players WON is to be free of collective and collusive rules that limit competition for their services. A right people in most other industries have. BUT — are here comes the dose of medicine — the outcome of that competition is NOT just a bag of money. It comes in the forms of contractual rights and remedies. Just like for everyone else. Contracts in all kinds of industries restrict choices available to trading partners. Sometimes for really good reasons. Exclusive NIL rights might make the bag of money bigger but come with some real obligations. You, student-athletes, have caught the tiger by the tail. Be careful what you do with it!!! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Duke QB to Miami?
Top
Bottom