Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="reedny, post: 2363035, member: 1423"] Emmert's a piece of work. First he comes out with his lame wheelhouse pitch. Then the NCAA reverses course and assumes jurisdiction -- filing a comprehensive NOV against UNC (including the sham courses). Fast forward a few months, and the NCAA does another 180, amending its NOV against UNC to [I]remove [/I]FB/BB (i.e., neuters the NOV). Then it publicly rejects UNC's academic freedom argument. Then UNC changes it's story claiming IT has determined there was no fraud. And pooof, the NCAA reverts to its original position, backs off and basically accepts UNC's cynical, self-serving academic freedom argument the COI had publicly rejected 2 months before. Wow. And Emmert's "disappointed" in the lack of public confidence? lol Confusion reigns supreme here. The NCAA doesn't just need a moral compass. It needs someone competent to run the organization and members that can look themselves in the mirror with a straight face. [/QUOTE]