Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Eric15, post: 3882298, member: 676"] SWC I think you're a voice of reason 99% of the time but I'm just not quite understanding this take. The committee putting a 1-loss non-conference champion ahead of a 1-loss conference champion from the same conference, the latter of which beat the former, would be extremely unlikely in my opinion. I don't buy into the "certain teams get preferential treatment" paranoia. Teams like Bama and Clemson are always in the mix because they're always great. Now, if that conference champion has [U]two[/U] losses, that changes the calculus a bit. 2016 Big Ten champ Penn State was behind 1-loss Ohio State who they beat. Mostly because Ohio State had extremely difficult wins on it's resume (at Oklahoma and at Wisconsin). [/QUOTE]