Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="dollarbill44, post: 9993, member: 686"] It's funny how many people are saying this and that about "dealbreakers" and "non-starters" for different parties when the fact is these "non-negotiable" points are all starting points in discussions. When we're talking about survival of conferences or athletic programs, everything is on the table. I don't think any party involved in this mess is not willing to give on certain points in order to greatly improve their long-term prospects. For example, I think it's naive to think that Texas and the B10 can't come to an agreement on future network arrangements that are mutually acceptable in order to add them to the conference just because UT has stated they won't share revenues or that the B10 won't allow individual networks. The NW post laid out roughly how this could go down. [/QUOTE]