Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Cusefan95, post: 5736927, member: 173"]
It was unfair for some of the pro-GMac crowd to claim the ONLY reason people didn’t want him was because they wanted an outsider hired.  But there were at least three or four clowns pushing that narrative here.  I’m fine with pushing the counter-narrative and saying the only reason you wanted GMac was you insisted on a family hire.  I don’t really care if that bothers you.

I’m more annoyed that some members of the GMac only crew are now setting the bar at anything less than the NCAA tournament.  “Competitive” or “Bubble at minimum” qualify as a low standard.  I don’t remotely care about any excuses - if GMac doesn’t make the tourney, the season is a failure.  The idea that GMac absolutely had to be the guy if NIT or .500 is “success” is mind boggling to me - and it shows the real issue was that my narrative was -for some here - absolutely correct.  They’d rather lose with GMac coaching than win with an outsider hired hire.  It’s pathetic.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?