Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="sufan59, post: 5742403, member: 8789"] Probably because I don’t think he is going to go for flashy unless it’s the good version of flashy. The good version of flashy probably has suitors with a more proven track record and reputation at this level. GMAC may have issues year 1 getting the best of the right players until he shows proof of product at the high major level to get in on the good version of flashy, which is ok. Basically what I’m saying, I would rather GMAC not spend all the money he has if he can’t get the good version of flashy players and spend less on average players with the right work ethic than spend all of it on the bad version of flashy. We will find out, but year 1 is all about establishing a culture that’s priority number 1 imo. [/QUOTE]