Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Waltdods, post: 2355881, member: 2932"]
But this is a moving target. We started with a debate about whether the players are fairly compensated. We seem to be in agreeement that they aren't (the post just before yours says that if the rules were changed U.K. boosters would pay 10k for a shirt from a player). Now we are arguing whether it is practical for the players to receive compensation. On that, I think the actual legal impediments are much more surmountable than people want to think but that's also not the debate we started with.

People like the status quo. I get that. So do I, more or less. But we are here due to a weird set of contingencies that have the result of benefiting many people at the expense of many others. To defend it, you end up bouncing around from "value of education" to "if they don't like it they can go to Europe (or community college)" to "it's the law!" To "U.K. Boosters would abuse the system if it changed" (they do already of course) to "what about d-3 players"
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?