Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 2508994, member: 1969"] It does impact SU. As noted in a post above, when I set the target for Syracuse early in January I called 9-9 a lock. It would result in a low to mid 30 RPI at the time. I figured we would have enough quality to be on the radar. This is the biggest hurdle for Syracuse. But there are a few other teams that are on the same boat, and if we can get 2 more q1 wins it puts us in range. There will need to be a few teams with a poor quality win profile that get in. This is the odd scenario we could have, and it is driven by quality wins: 2016 - Syracuse highest RPI for a team to get an at-large. 2018 - Syracuse lowest RPI from the ACC not to get an at-large [/QUOTE]