Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="HoustonCuse, post: 1185342, member: 87"] The article is making the case that Syracuse is a rogue program and Boeheim isn't on the hot seat, yet Crean runs a squeaky clean outfit and is on the hot seat. It is trying to say "winning fixes all evils." Boeheim runs a sess pool program rotten to the core, but since he's winning, nobody cares, all the while Crean is pure as the driven snow (short a few hot make-out sessions with his son in the stands) yet is fighting for his coaching life because his team has struggled, with his biggest loss was to a group of beer swilling, class skipping, turn signal snapping pot heads... There is fundamental flaw in the logic in that the failed drug tests alluded to are a). only alleged at this time, and b). even if factual, seemed to not be applicable to players on the team that beat Crean's choir boys. [/QUOTE]