Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jekelish, post: 1422782, member: 82"] Washington is mentioned; if you go to the last slide, we mentioned that Washington got a much more in depth analysis a couple months ago, and linked directly to that. It would have been a little redundant to include him. And thanks! It was actually [USER=227]JackBauer44[/USER] who wrote this one up and does most of the breakdowns of recruits, and also who doesn't like sweet tea. Then again, I don't like sweet tea either so it might just be a prerequisite for writing for the site. [/QUOTE]