Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="reedny, post: 1175734, member: 1423"]
Well that's part true, part false. I agree with you about Clemson -- but only because they didn't have their starting QB. If they have him, it wouldn't have been as close despite our hard-working defense.

As far as the ACC, obviously it is a quality league, much more competitive than the BE as our record indicates. Sorry but it's not just FSU and Clemson, as lopsided scores might remind you (G-Tech pasted us). Again this year, a middle of the pack (now B1G) Maryland team pasted us. If we played Miami they would paste us. Even Duke is 6-1 -- I'm going to pray that we don't loose to them -- wow talk about a low point. I mean, the evidence is abundant -- all we're doing here, for the most part, is hopding we don't get embarrassed. We were not in the game against, Md, Louisville or FSU. We were in the game for a period against Clemson b/c of lights out defense .. but looking back, we never had a chance with our offense. We scored one touchdown against Wake Forrest. None against Clemson. None against Louisville.

I wear Orange glasses, too, but ... our offense is borderline unwatchable. We can't score against any decent team, let alone good ACC teams. What's the plan here? Wait 2 years for Long to "develop" and fill out? How many years is it going to take to bring in some receivers that can actually get open against the upper half of the conference?  I'm getting nervous.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?