Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Mareiniss, post: 2963313, member: 714"] Not necessarily. In some drug testing situations, a urine sample is split in two. If the first split sample tests positive, a second test is performed on the second split sample by a different lab, as a cautionary check, in case the first lab made an error of any sort. [B][I]IF[/I][/B] the DO’s story is accurate, maybe Frank traveled to SLC with the team while the second test results were still pending; but when the second test confirmed the first test, some time today, the suspension was imposed. I don’t have any inside info, and hope the DO got it wrong. Unfortunately, it doesn’t look good for Frank at this point. [/QUOTE]