SWC75
Bored Historian
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 33,991
- Like
- 65,565
Just watched some highlight films on each, (guess what- they score a lot of touchdowns). Fredricks looks like a mostly straight ahead runner with a tremendous burst through the hole. Strickland showed more moves. Perkins had the most zig-zag to him. I love north-south runners but with our offense, having a guy who can make something out of nothing is a good thing, too. All are about the same size, (5-11 185, 6-0 180, 6-0 190). They all seem to be very quick, although we have to remember they were out-running high school kids.
I think they could all be good running backs for us. Strickland and Perkins were also shown making good plays as D-backs. I keep hearing Fredricks and Strickland's names but not much about Perkins. I thought by a small margin, he might have been the most impressive guy.
Fredricks: http://www.hudl.com/athlete/1576908/jordan-fredericks
Strickland:
Perkins: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3uA7pjWkM8
I think it would be absurd to give one of these guys #44 now and not the other two, (or the guys we've got on the roster now). I think it would be great if they competed to see who would wear it in their senior year.
I think they could all be good running backs for us. Strickland and Perkins were also shown making good plays as D-backs. I keep hearing Fredricks and Strickland's names but not much about Perkins. I thought by a small margin, he might have been the most impressive guy.
Fredricks: http://www.hudl.com/athlete/1576908/jordan-fredericks
Strickland:
Perkins: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3uA7pjWkM8
I think it would be absurd to give one of these guys #44 now and not the other two, (or the guys we've got on the roster now). I think it would be great if they competed to see who would wear it in their senior year.